In recent news, a Mexican man was cleared of all his rape charges. Not that he did not commit the rape, he did. He raped a 17-year-old girl. But here is what the Judge said: He said that he had not satisfied his sexual appetite and did not intend to copulate.
Judge Anuar Gonzalez Hemadi said that the man should be released as even if he had penetrated the girl with his fingers and had touched her in inappropriate places, he had acted without any sexual intent!
Faith in humanity? Lost and long gone.
This case has now been picked up by many publication houses as well as social media pages, and is gaining critics from all over the world.
The one thing that the boys did right? They were born in rich families. Duh! You get born in rich families and then rape, what happens? You get free!
This is what the Judge said, so judge him all you want.
“Testimony from the minor doesn’t provide any indications – that is, an insinuation, obscene word, proximity, situation – that the [defendant’s] conduct was deliberate sexual abuse with erotic intentions or meant to satisfy sexual urges.”
“Touching or incidental rubbing, be it in a public or private place, would not be considered a sexual act if the element of intent to satisfy a sexual desire at the expense of the passive subject is absent.”
“It is possible to consider that there was no purpose to copulate,” the judge concluded.
“It’s inconceivable,” he said. “I am surprised and angry. Two years of fighting, battling, of rowing against the current so that they conclude this. They got away with the arrest order and now they are giving him legal protection two years later. This is a joke, it’s absurd.”
Let’s see what the victim has in store for her.
Watch the video here.